The Equal Pay Directive – the directive and Norwegian legislation

The Equal Pay Directive – the directive and Norwegian legislation

Through the Equal Pay Directive, the EU has introduced new rules and enforcement tools to counteract pay differences between the sexes. Norwegian employers are already bound by the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act, which among other things requires them to work actively with and report on pay and working conditions. Even so, the directive will entail more extensive requirements for both procedures and reporting once it is implemented in Norwegian law.

The Government has stated that transparency about pay gives employees the opportunity to detect and prove possible differential treatment based on gender. Mapping pay may also reveal imbalances in pay systems and job classification. This in turn may increase awareness and stimulate debate about the causes of structural pay differences between women and men. The Government therefore believes that pay transparency may improve companies’ equality policies and promote closer cooperation between employer and employee representatives.

It is essential to emphasise that the directive does not prohibit different pay where the differences are based on legitimate, gender-neutral and objective assessments. Pay differences may, for example, be justified by experience, competence, responsibility or other relevant criteria. However, the directive tightens the requirements that pay determination must be based on objective and gender-neutral criteria, and that the employer must be able to account for the basis of pay differences.

Under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act, the reporting obligation currently applies to enterprises with more than 50 employees, and certain obligations also apply to enterprises with between 20 and 50 employees. The Equal Pay Directive has a different, tiered system. Under the directive, enterprises with 250 or more employees must report annually from 7 June 2027, while enterprises with 150–249 employees must report every three years from the same date. Enterprises with 100–149 employees will be subject to the reporting obligation from 7 June 2031, also every three years. The directive does not impose a corresponding reporting obligation on enterprises with fewer than 100 employees, but Member States are free to introduce stricter rules.

EU Member States had until 7 June 2026 to implement the directive into national law. This deadline does not apply to Norway. The directive has not yet been incorporated into the EEA Agreement, so no Norwegian implementation deadline has been set. The Government has assessed the directive as EEA-relevant and has begun work on how it can be implemented in Norwegian law. As of September 2026, however, no Norwegian consultation paper or bill has been presented. The Government has also stated that it has reason to believe the directive will be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

It therefore remains uncertain exactly how the Norwegian rules will be formulated. Norwegian enterprises should nevertheless follow developments and begin preparing for the new requirements.

Changes in the employer’s responsibilities – what will be new?

The Equal Pay Directive brings with it several new and stricter requirements compared with the current Norwegian regulatory framework:

  • Simplified assessment of work: The directive provides for a simpler process to determine what is considered equal work. In its assessment, the employer must rely on objective factors such as competence, responsibility, seniority, education, quantitative effort and working environment. The concept of pay is expanded to include all forms of remuneration, including bonuses, overtime and pension. As a general rule, equal work shall have equal pay, but it may still be relevant to differentiate between employees who differ in the objective factors.
  • Different qualifications may be paid differently: The equal pay requirement means that pay must be based on gender-neutral criteria such as experience and qualifications. Pay differences that follow from such differences in qualifications are therefore permitted. It is lawful to give higher pay to someone with longer experience than to someone with shorter experience. It is only unlawful if the pay difference is due to discriminatory reasons such as gender, ethnicity or religion.
  • More insight and transparency: All employees will have the right to see both their own pay and the average pay broken down by gender within the same job category, regardless of any suspicion of discrimination. This information must therefore be accessible to all employees. Employers must also make the criteria for pay determination and pay progression easily available, and no attempts shall be made to prevent employees from sharing information about their own pay.
  • Better routines: Enterprises must be able to document which criteria are used for pay determination and pay progression, and how positions are assessed and classified. It will therefore become more important to have a systematic and gender-neutral pay system, and to be able to explain and document the basis for pay differences between employees who perform the same work or work of equal value. In 2026, the European Commission also published guidance on gender-neutral job evaluation and job classification.
  • Transparency in recruitment: The directive requires that job applicants receive information about the starting salary or salary range in a way that enables informed and transparent pay negotiations, for example in the job advertisement or before the interview. Employers must not ask for or seek to obtain information about the candidate’s current or previous pay. Job advertisements and job titles must also be gender-neutral.
  • Stricter reporting requirements: The directive introduces a tiered reporting obligation for enterprises with at least 100 employees. The reporting must include, among other things, information on pay differences between women and men and differences in variable pay components. The reporting must make it possible to identify any pay differences that cannot be explained by objective and gender-neutral factors. Norway may choose to introduce stricter reporting requirements than the directive’s minimum requirements.
  • Joint pay assessment in the event of unexplained differences: If the reporting shows a pay difference of at least 5 per cent between women and men in a category of workers, and the difference cannot be justified by objective and gender-neutral criteria or has not been remedied within six months, the employer must carry out a joint pay assessment in cooperation with the employee representatives. Among other things, the assessment must identify and explain the differences and set out measures to remedy any differences that cannot be objectively justified.
  • Strengthened enforcement and right to compensation: The directive strengthens employees’ ability to enforce the principle of equal pay. In the event of a breach of the rules, employees may be entitled to full compensation for losses resulting from the discrimination, including back pay and other relevant benefits, as well as interest. The directive also contains rules on the burden of proof and access to evidence intended to make it easier to enforce the right to equal pay.

Read more: Brækhus’s expertise in employment law

Measures enterprises should start implementing already now

Even though it is still unclear how the Norwegian rules will be formulated, enterprises should already begin preparing for the Equal Pay Directive. It is particularly advisable to review existing routines for pay determination and pay progression, and to assess whether the enterprise has clear and gender-neutral criteria for setting pay.

Enterprises should also consider how positions are categorised, and whether there are groups of employees who perform the same work or work of equal value. It should be possible to explain and document why employees with comparable duties receive different pay. Recruitment processes must also be adapted. Pay information must be provided to job applicants at a stage that allows for informed pay negotiations, and employers must not obtain information about the candidate’s current or previous pay. HR, managers and others involved in recruitment should therefore receive training in the new requirements.

Enterprises should also prepare to update the staff handbook and other relevant routines, so that employees receive information about their rights relating to pay and pay transparency. Routines should be established for how requests for pay information are to be handled, and for how the enterprise will document the criteria for pay determination and pay progression.

The reporting obligation under the directive will first apply to the largest enterprises from June 2027, and to enterprises with 100–149 employees only from 2031. This does not mean, however, that enterprises should postpone their preparations. Establishing sound systems for job classification, pay mapping and documentation of pay differences can take time. For enterprises already subject to the duty to act and report under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act, much of this work can build on existing routines.

It is also important to be aware that the directive has not yet been implemented in Norwegian law. The specific Norwegian requirements may therefore differ from the directive’s minimum rules. Enterprises should follow the further EEA and legislative process and adapt their routines once it becomes clear how the directive will be implemented in Norway.

Do you need help? Contact us today.

Fill in the form or get in touch with us directly.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

The Probationary Period Is an Opportunity for Both Employer and Employee

prøvetid

The Probationary Period Is an Opportunity for Both Employer and Employee

Many employers mistakenly believe that the probationary period is the same as temporary employment under Norwegian law. That is not correct. The general rule is that all employment relationships are permanent from the very first day, unless the law provides a legal basis for agreeing otherwise.

The probationary period can be a valuable tool for employers, provided they understand what it entails and how to use it correctly.

The probationary period is not a temporary employment contract—it is a statutory right for employers to assess whether the employee is suitable for the position, based on broader criteria than those applied later in the employment relationship. As a rule, all employment contracts are permanent. This means that every employee is considered permanent from day one, unless one of the exceptions in the Norwegian Working Environment Act applies.

Temporary employment is permitted only in a limited number of cases, all of which are listed in the Working Environment Act. If the employment relationship does not fall under one of those exceptions—for example, a substitute position for a named person—then the employment is permanent, even if the parties have agreed otherwise. A permanent employment relationship continues from the date of hiring until terminated by either party.

What Is the Probationary Period?

The probationary period is a statutory right for employers to assess three specific aspects of an employee:

  • professional competence
  • adaptation to the work
  • reliability

These three qualitative elements are used to determine whether the employment is a good fit. Dismissal still requires just cause, but the threshold is somewhat lower during the probationary period than later in the employment relationship.

It is important that the probationary period does not become just a passive observation period. The employee should receive concrete feedback, clear instructions, and well-defined goals.

The probationary period is not meant to be a “warm-up” for the real job. It is a defined period in which the employee must demonstrate mastery of their tasks, fit into the company culture, and follow given instructions. At the same time, the probationary period is also a six-month period in which the employer must show that the workplace is as promised—that it engages with its employees, provides sufficient and appropriate tasks, and makes expectations and requirements clear.

A Mutual Right to Step Back

The probationary period is, in practice, a mutual trial period.

With good planning and proper follow-up, the risk of a poor hire is significantly reduced. For the employer, the probationary period offers room to test candidates they may be unsure about, or wish to give a chance despite some mismatches. As long as agreements, goals, feedback, and efforts to give the employee the best chance of success are documented, the probationary period provides a genuine opportunity to reverse course.

It is a chance for both parties to walk away if the employment relationship turns out not to be the match they expected. It is important to remember that an employment relationship, like any other relationship, depends on both parties thriving and developing.

Our Key Advice Before Starting Employment: Do Your Groundwork Well!

  • Job posting: Be specific and clear; avoid buzzwords.
  • Test, test, and test again: Use the interview to test competence, and continue testing throughout the probationary period.
  • Onboarding plan: Have a strategy for introductions—help the employee get to know the company and their tasks. Be crystal clear about expectations.

The Most Important Advice for the Probationary Period

  • Feedback: Follow up with formal meetings and provide clear, honest messages.
  • Documentation: Keep written records of employee performance, as well as the instructions, feedback, and information provided. Summarize conversations in an email.
  • Collaboration: Plan activities that promote the employer’s expectations and support the employee’s areas for improvement.

Summary

The probationary period is an important phase to ensure that both employer and employee are satisfied with the employment relationship. When used correctly, it gives both parties a real opportunity to assess whether the relationship should continue. The key to a successful probationary period is clarity, structure, and documentation.

Read more: Brækhus’ expertise in employment law

Need help or have questions about probationary periods?

Fill out the form below or contact our employment law attorneys directly.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

Brækhus advised ISS Corporate on the acquisition of technology company Celsia

Brækhus advised ISS Corporate on the acquisition of technology company Celsia

ISS Corporate Solutions, Inc. (“ISS Corporate”), a leading provider of compensation, governance, cyber risk monitoring, and sustainability offerings to help companies improve shareholder value and reduce risk, announced on April 11th the acquisition of Celsia. Celsia is an Oslo-based provider of SaaS solutions for corporate sustainability reporting.

Brækhus acted as buy-side legal advisor in connection with the acquisition of Celsia. The core team consisted of Christoph Morck, Kristine Slotnæs, Alexander Mollan and Ingrid Abildsgaard. The team assisted ISS Corporate throughout the entire acquisition process, from due diligence through the drafting and negotiation of relevant transaction documents until the signing and closing.

Formed in 2021, Celsia‘s software simplifies regulatory sustainability reporting with a particular focus on solving for the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) regulations. The CSRD, which took effect on 1 January, includes the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, an extensive, detailed new sustainability reporting framework that is addressed by Celsia’s offering. Celsia’s software also supports EU Taxonomy and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation reporting requirements. Presently, more than 300 companies rely on Celsia’s software solutions and the expertise of its staff for accurate and timely sustainability reporting.

ISS Corporate provides expertise in designing and managing governance, compensation, sustainability, and cyber risk programs that align with company goals, reduce risk, and manage the needs of a diverse shareholder base by delivering data, tools, and advisory services. ISS Corporate’s global client base extends across North America, Europe, Asia, and other established and emerging markets worldwide. ISS Corporate is a wholly owned subsidiary of Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., majority owned by Deutsche Börse Group.

Click here for the full press release from ISS Corporate.

Our lawyers are recognised by The Legal 500

Our lawyers are recognised by The Legal 500

Each year, law firms around the world are assessed and ranked by Legal 500. The rankings are based on feedback from clients and other market research. This year too, Brækhus is ranked as a Leading Firm.

In this year’s edition of Legal 500, a number of our lawyers, spread across various fields of expertise, receive recognition for their specialist skills.

Partners Alexander Mollan and Julius Berg Kaasin also achieve individual rankings and are ranked in the category ‘Next Generation Partner’. Alexander is recognised for his in-depth expertise in the field of TMT, and Julius is recognised for his expertise in the field of Intellectual Property.

We are pleased to observe that the fields in which we receive recognition by The Legal 500 represent core business areas for Brækhus. This underline our strong competence environments.

This is what some of our clients say about us:

Highly competent, proactive and we were involved well along the way

Our experience with Brækhus is that they always seek the right expertise from the right person so that challenges and problems can be highlighted quickly. This means that the right solutions are chosen in a short time

A very nice, friendly, cooperative and resolutive team. They are always willing to help and support you in your cases, propose alternative ideas and solutions, and be honest and clear about your situation

An extremely high level of expertise, insight and experience that we as clients can capitalise on. Not least very quick responses to inquiries

Our lawyers have been recognised in Legal 500 2023

Our lawyers have been recognised in Legal 500 2023

Our lawyers have been recognised in the 2023 edition of Legal 500, a comprehensive global guide to law firms. Each year, Legal 500 evaluates and ranks law firms worldwide based on client feedback and market research. In this year’s edition, Brækhus has been ranked as a Leading Firm.

15 of our lawyers across 6 practice areas have been acknowledged in this year’s edition of Legal 500. Associate Partner Alexander Mollan has been named ‘Next Generation Partner’ for his expertise in the TMT (Technology, Media, and Telecommunications) practice area.

The recognized practice areas are fundamental to Brækhus’ core business, and we take great pride in being highlighted by Legal 500 for our strong expertise in these areas.

Our firm has been ranked in the following practice areas:

What our clients say about us:

Quick response rate. Clear recommendations. Efficient use of resources. Close follow-up.

Very diverse and competent team with international knowledge and a very service-minded approach.

Takes a holistic approach, and guides on commercial aspects to make sure nothing falls between the cracks.

No fuss, straight to the point. Great people to work with. Delivers results.

New restrictions on hiring temporary employees from staffing companies

New restrictions on hiring temporary employees from staffing companies

New legislation on hiring personnel temporarily
from staffing companies has been passed in Norway, and will be effective from 1 April 2023.

The rules on hiring from staffing companies is significantly tightened. The objective of the new restrictions is to limit the staffing industry’s scope and role, and to ensure full and permanent positions based on a two-party relationship between the employee and the employer. The changes support the main rule in the Working Environment Act that employees should be employed permanently.

The new rules will come into force on 1 April 2023, but with a three months transitional period for contracts already entered into.

The following changes have been adopted:

  • It is as a main rule no longer allowed to hire personnel for temporary work from staffing agencies.

In the event of a temporary need of labor (i.e. seasonal workers), it may be possible to hire temporarily if an agreement with the company’s union representatives allowing for hire of employees from staffing companies for temporary work. Such agreements will only be possible for companies bound by collective agreements with trade unions of a certain size.

  • Hiring of health personnel may, subject to further considerations, still be allowed.
  • Hiring of specialist workers performing advisory and consultancy services in clearly defined projects may, subject to further considerations, still be allowed.
  • Employees temporarily hired for more than 3 years continuously is given the right to permanent employment in the company which hired them (independent hiring basis)
  • The distinction between hiring of staff and engagements under service contracts is clarified more closely. A practical and legal guide on the matter will be prepared by the authorities.
  • The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority (Arbeidstilsynet) is given extensive responsibility and authority to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

Please note that hiring employees from companies, whose main purpose is not to hire out labor is not affected by the restrictions. There are certain criteria which will have to be fulfilled and each specific case will have to be assessed closely before hire from such companies are carried out.

Furthermore, it will still be possible to make use of service contracts (i.e., subcontractors). The legal amendments also bring new provisions to clarify the distinctions between hiring of labor and service contracting. There are new additional factors to consider when assessing whether there is a hiring of employees or a service agreement (In Norwegian: entreprise). The rules lean towards defining more contracts as hiring of employees than before.

The new regulation intends not to introduce any new regulation for determining what is a staffing agency. As of today, in addition to typical agencies whose only business is lease of personnel, companies having its main revenue from lease of personnel will be covered. The same goes for companies with longer lease contracts and lease of personnel as separate business lines.

The new regulation will definitely create a need to look further into whether the company hiring out employees, is to be defined as a staffing agency. Further, it will be important to clarify if a classification as hire of personnel is likely and, if possible, to adjust contracts to avoid such a classification. Above all, the new situation needs to be addressed in order to avoid interruptions where previous used personnel are not able to perform work agreed. Change of model will also have an impact the tax situation for both the company and foreign employees used in Norway.

In what situations will it be possible to hire from staffing companies?

  • For temporary replacement of permanent employees during holidays, leave of absence, sick leave and similar situations.
  • Work training as for instance trainees.
  • For participants in Labor market schemes under the auspices of or in cooperation with the Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV).
  • For athletes, trainers, referees and other leaders within organized sports
  • Upon agreement with employees’ union representatives, if the company is bound by a collective agreement with a trade union of a certain size.

Options for companies in need of increased labor for a limited period:

  • Increase the number of permanent employees
  • Hire employees from companies which main purpose is not being a staffing company
  • Employ workers temporarily directly in the company
  • Divide the work by entering into construction agreements with clients.

These options will have to be assessed further based on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.

Special rules for construction work on construction sites in Oslo, Viken and former Vestfold county

A ban is introduced on hiring from staffing companies for construction work on construction sites in the aforementioned areas.

As of from 1 April 2023, it will be no possibility of hiring from staffing companies on construction sites in these areas as regards to the construction work. A transition period of 3 months applies to already concluded contracts.

The terms “construction work” and “construction site” are defined in separate regulations.

Our team is here to discuss these matters with you. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us.